<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neil Shah&#039;s Telecom Research Analysis &#38; Insights &#187; revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shahneil.com/tag/revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shahneil.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Understanding the WiMAX Business Model</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/wimax-business-model/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=wimax-business-model</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/wimax-business-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feasibility Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEX/CAPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backhaul cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint "mobile broadband"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total cost of ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax investment cost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technowizz.wordpress.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The transition to the next generation network has been already envisioned by the industry players and the move has been outlined to meet the set objectives. The higher level objectives include offering higher data rates, greater system efficiencies, increased data capacity, highly scalable and flatter all-IP architecture with successful interoperability with mobile devices across different networks and technologies. This leads to advent of next generation networks like Mobile WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access)  developed jointly by IEEE and WiMAX forum based on IEEE802.16e-2005 global standard and LTE (Long Term Evolution) developed by 3GPP in its Release 8.
We will deep dive into the WiMAX business model analyzing the total cost of ownership, revenues and map the current state of WiMAX deployments around the world.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/wimax-business-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSPA, EVDO, WiMax then LTE but what about the mobile backhaul??</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2009/11/hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2009/11/hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feasibility Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEX/CAPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3GPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G backhaul migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALL IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all ip network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eVDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile back haul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technowizz.wordpress.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the next few years, “user experience” will still continue to rely on 3G (and in some regions on 2G) technology.But for the mobile operator, LTE/WiMax is already part of the game plan. Operators have to learn the technology, and its impact on their networks, applications and service offering. Though, Service providers are seeking revenue and profit growth through new differentiated packet-based services. Many of these services, such as mobile Internet and mobile TV, require high bandwidth—and the current backhaul infrastructure is not optimized for handling such traffic. Hence, providers have to add backhaul capacity while keeping operational costs under control, a situation that is forcing carriers to migrate their access and core networks to the new 3G and 4G infrastructure. The point is which solution is the best, whether T1 or microwave, fiber or hybrid...lets check which serves the best cost, throughput and deployment advantage..]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2009/11/hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

