<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neil Shah&#039;s Telecom Research Analysis &#38; Insights &#187; WiMAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shahneil.com/category/wireless-communications/standards/wimax-standards-wireless-communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shahneil.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LTE and WiMAX will leverage M2M services</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2010/07/lte-wimax-leverage-m2m-services/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=lte-wimax-leverage-m2m-services</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2010/07/lte-wimax-leverage-m2m-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3GPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feasibility Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEX/CAPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Organizing Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Use Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value Chain Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G M2M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE M2M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M m-health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M MVNE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M MVNO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M over the air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M smart grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M smart meters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M telemetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2M use cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine-to-machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX M2m]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahneil.com/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M2M communications offers plethora of opportunities to - right from product manufacturers to service providers to mobile network operators and to the end-users in generating significant value out of this service. M2M communication service is a game changer in a way the machines communicate directly with one another for example: over-the-air upgrades, updates, monitoring, troubleshooting, security, information extraction, tracking, etc. M2M service is possible in almost any future device in house or office which possesses the potential to access internet or a broadband connection]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2010/07/lte-wimax-leverage-m2m-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should AT&amp;T Deploy HSPA+ Or Jump To LTE ?</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2010/05/att-deploy-hspa-jump-lte/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=att-deploy-hspa-jump-lte</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2010/05/att-deploy-hspa-jump-lte/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 06:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3GPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3GPP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feasibility Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEX/CAPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance & Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T 4G plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T HSPA+ or LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T LTE 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC EVO 4G Sprint WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MetroPCS LTE 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile HSPA+ 21 Mbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US 3G subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US LTE rollout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA next generation network (NGN) roadmap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahneil.com/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Verizon Wireless, Metro PCS, Sprint and T-Mobile quite clear with their NGN roadmap, all eyes are glued on to AT&#038;T  on its NGN roadmap.The case here is whether the big blue operator should roll out HSPA+ or jump directly to LTE or even both.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2010/05/att-deploy-hspa-jump-lte/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2.6 GHz Spectrum &amp; the Next Generation Mobile Broadband Networks</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/2-6-ghz-spectrum-the-next-generation-mobile-broadband-networks/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=2-6-ghz-spectrum-the-next-generation-mobile-broadband-networks</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/2-6-ghz-spectrum-the-next-generation-mobile-broadband-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3GPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3GPP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEX/CAPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.5 GHz band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.6 GHz band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.6 GHz spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.6 GHz spectrum Auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2500-2690 MHz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G expansion band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[700 MHz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital dividend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDD vs TDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDD/TDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMT 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITU-T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next generation network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paired spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpaired spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WRC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technowizz.wordpress.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The licensing of the 2.6 GHz band will be critical to unlocking the benefits of global scale economies in the Mobile Broadband market. The outcome of 2.6GHz allocation will have far-reaching consequences for how the adoption dynamics of WiMAX and 3GPP (such as HSPA and, in future, LTE) will play out in this region since 2.6 GHz is the first arena where the two proponents will be battling each other in the same area of spectrum.So let's jump in discussing and analyzing about the 2.6GHz band its importance, what’s in store and bulleting the future of mobile broadband.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/2-6-ghz-spectrum-the-next-generation-mobile-broadband-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Location Based Services Part II: LBS Network Architectures</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/location-based-services-architectures/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=location-based-services-architectures</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/location-based-services-architectures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3GPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3GPP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Location Based Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3GPP Release 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control plane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBS-ADV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location client server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Mobile Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[position determining entity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Position server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure user plane location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service control point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLP SUPL Location Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUPL enabled Terminal SET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user plane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technowizz.wordpress.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

In the previous blog LBS Part I we discussed about the different Location technologies and their comparisons on different parameters with their advantages/disadvantages. Today we will see how these positioning technologies integrate with the network architecture in different Wireless Standards (3GPP, 3GPP2, OMA, WiMAX, LTE)
We will first start with categorizing the location services by their <a href="http://shahneil.com/2010/01/location-based-services-architectures/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/location-based-services-architectures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the WiMAX Business Model</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/wimax-business-model/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=wimax-business-model</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/wimax-business-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feasibility Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEX/CAPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backhaul cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint "mobile broadband"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total cost of ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax investment cost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technowizz.wordpress.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The transition to the next generation network has been already envisioned by the industry players and the move has been outlined to meet the set objectives. The higher level objectives include offering higher data rates, greater system efficiencies, increased data capacity, highly scalable and flatter all-IP architecture with successful interoperability with mobile devices across different networks and technologies. This leads to advent of next generation networks like Mobile WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access)  developed jointly by IEEE and WiMAX forum based on IEEE802.16e-2005 global standard and LTE (Long Term Evolution) developed by 3GPP in its Release 8.
We will deep dive into the WiMAX business model analyzing the total cost of ownership, revenues and map the current state of WiMAX deployments around the world.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2010/01/wimax-business-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSPA, EVDO, WiMax then LTE but what about the mobile backhaul??</title>
		<link>http://shahneil.com/2009/11/hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul</link>
		<comments>http://shahneil.com/2009/11/hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feasibility Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEX/CAPEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3GPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G backhaul migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALL IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all ip network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eVDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile back haul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SONET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technowizz.wordpress.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the next few years, “user experience” will still continue to rely on 3G (and in some regions on 2G) technology.But for the mobile operator, LTE/WiMax is already part of the game plan. Operators have to learn the technology, and its impact on their networks, applications and service offering. Though, Service providers are seeking revenue and profit growth through new differentiated packet-based services. Many of these services, such as mobile Internet and mobile TV, require high bandwidth—and the current backhaul infrastructure is not optimized for handling such traffic. Hence, providers have to add backhaul capacity while keeping operational costs under control, a situation that is forcing carriers to migrate their access and core networks to the new 3G and 4G infrastructure. The point is which solution is the best, whether T1 or microwave, fiber or hybrid...lets check which serves the best cost, throughput and deployment advantage..]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shahneil.com/2009/11/hspa-evdo-wimax-then-lte-but-what-about-the-mobile-backhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

